Association between physical frailty, circadian syndrome and cardiovascular disease among middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal study

Abstract

BackgroundPhysical frailty (PF) and circadian syndrome (CircS) are proposed as novel risks for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but little attention is paid to their combined impact on CVD. This study aimed to investigate the association of PF, CircS and CVD in middle-aged and older adults.MethodsThe sample comprised 8512 participants aged at least 45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) 2011. PF was examined by the physical frailty phenotype scale. CircS was assessed by the components of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) MetS plus short sleep duration and depression. The cut-off for CircS was set as ≥ 4. CVD was defined as the presence of physician-diagnosed heart disease and/or stroke. A total of 6176 participants without CVD recruited from CHARLS 2011 and were followed up in 2018.ResultsThe prevalence of CVD in total populations, neither CircS or PF, PF alone, CircS alone and both CircS and PF were 13.0%, 7.4%, 15.5%, 17.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. CircS was more likely to be PF [OR (95%CI): 2.070 (1.732 ∼ 2.472)] than those without CircS. Both CircS alone [OR (95% CI): 1.954 (1.663 ∼ 2.296)], and coexisting CircS and PF [3.508 (2.739 ∼ 4.494)] were associated with CVD. Longitudinal analysis showed that individuals with both CircS and PF (HR: 1.716, 95%CI: 1.314 ∼ 2.240) and CircS alone [1.520 (1.331 ∼ 1.737)] were more likely to have new onset CVD than neither CircS or PF peers.ConclusionPF and CircS together are associated with higher CVD risk, which provided new evidence for a strong relation that warrants attention to assessing PF and CircS and in community to promote healthy aging.