Abstract

BackgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a specific neurovascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Clinically, family history is a widely recognized risk factor for DR, assisting diagnosis and risk strata. However, among a great amount of DR patients without hereditary history like hypertension and diabetes, direct and simple risk factors to assist clinical decisions are still required. Herein, we intend to investigate the associated risk factors for these DR patients based on systemic inflammatory response indexes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).MethodsWe consecutively enrolled 1030 patients with a definite diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from the endocrinology department of the Second hospital of People in Yun Nan. Based on funduscopy and family history checking, we excluded patients with a family history of hypertension and diabetes and finally enrolled 264 patients with DR and 206 patients with non-diabetic retinopathy (NDR). Through correlation analysis, univariate and multivariate regression, we further explore the association between NLR, PLR, and DR. On top of that, we investigate the effect of NLR and PLR on risk reclassification of DR.ResultsCompared with NDR patients, NLR and PLR levels are significantly higher among DR patients (NLR: 2.36 ± 1.16 in DR group versus 1.97 ± 1.06 in NDR group, p < 0.001; PLR: 11.62 ± 4.55 in DR group versus10.56 ± 4.45 in NDR group, p = 0.012). According to univariate analysis, NLR and PLR add risks to DR. After fully adjusting co-founders, NLR, as both continuous and categorical variate, remains an independent risk factor for DR (OR (95%CI): 1.37 (1.06, 1.78) P = 0.018). And though PLR was not independently associated with DR as a continuous variable (OR (95%CI) 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) p = 0.135), the highest quantile of PLR add two-fold increased risk (OR (95%CI) 2.20 (1.05, 4.59) p = 0.037) in the fully adjusted model for DR. In addition, addition of PLR and NLR to the established factor hemoglobin (Hb) improved the discriminability of the model and assisted the reclassification of DR. After combining PLR and NLR the Area under curve (AUC) of Hb based model raised from 0.76 to 0.78, with a category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 0.532 (p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of 0.029 (p < 0.001).ConclusionsSystemic inflammatory response indexes NLR and PLR were associated with the presence of DR among patients without associated family history and contributed to improvements in reclassification of DR in addition to Hb.

Highlights

  • Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a specific neurovascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM)

  • Systemic inflammatory response indexes neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-tolymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with the presence of DR among patients without associated family history and contributed to improvements in reclassification of DR in addition to Hb

  • Our research demonstrated the association of systemic inflammatory response index with diabetic retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients without related family histories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a specific neurovascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Among a great amount of DR patients without hereditary history like hypertension and diabetes, direct and simple risk factors to assist clinical decisions are still required. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as a specific neurovascular complication of diabetes mellitus(DM),become a major reason for blinding people aged 20–74 [1]. According to the major researches, commonly acknowledged risk factors include family history, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, long-duration of diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, blood glucose fluctuation, obesity and gestation [2,3,4,5]. In clinical practice, despite the complicated inheritable factors, a large number of diabetic patients without obvious family history take up a major part of DR patients. Exploring risk factors for these people is quite important for clinical decisions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call