Abstract

The success rate of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is not satisfactory, for reasons that are unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between left atrial reverse remodeling after ablation and recurrence of AF in patients with persistent AF. One hundred and thirty-two patients with persistent AF were enrolled. Extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms was performed. Bepridil or amiodarone was prescribed for 3 months after ablation. All patients were studied by serial echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram at baseline, for the day after ablation, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals after ablation. Recurrence of AF was observed in 42 patients at 2-year follow-up. The duration of AF (median 12 (IQR 6–37) vs 8 (IQR 5–17) months, p < 0.05), and early recurrence of AF (69 vs 26%, p < 0.05) after ablation were significantly different between the patients with AF recurrence and those without. The left atrial dimensions at 3 months (40 ± 6 vs 44 ± 6 mm, p < 0.001) and 6 months (40 ± 6 vs 44 ± 6 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller than those just after ablation in the patients without AF recurrence. A 5% reduction from baseline in the left atrial dimension at 6 months after ablation was associated with freedom from late AF recurrence (p < 0.05). Left atrial reverse remodeling after ablation of persistent AF was associated with freedom from late recurrence of AF.

Highlights

  • Pulmonary vein isolation is an established and effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) [1]

  • An additional linear ablation extending from the mitral valve annulus to the junction of the left inferior PV was performed in four cases, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed on the patients complicated with common atrial flutter (n = 10, 8%)

  • Superior vena cava isolation was performed in a few patients with AF recurrence (n = 4, 3%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pulmonary vein isolation is an established and effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) [1]. The success rates of catheter ablation for patients with persistent AF are not satisfactory, for reasons that are unclear. Intensive ablation of the left atrium (LA) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation combined with extensive pulmonary vein isolation (EPVI) improves outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF [2], but a substantial portion of these patients experience relapse of AF. The STAR AF II trial clearly showed that additional substrate modification (CFAE or linear lesions) following EPVI offers no benefit in AF reduction [3]. A critical issue is how to identify patients in

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call