Abstract
Introduction: Glycemic gap (GG), as determined by the difference between glucose and the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-derived estimated average glucose (eAG), is associated with poor outcomes in various clinical settings. There is a paucity of data describing GG and outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our main objectives were to evaluate the association of admission glycemic gap (aGG) with in-hospital mortality and with poor composite outcome and to compare aGG's predictive value to admission serum glucose. Secondary outcomes were the associations between aGG and neurologic complications including vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia following aSAH.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 119 adult patients with aSAH admitted to a single tertiary care neuroscience ICU. Spearman method was used for correlation for non-normality of data. Area under the curve (AUC) for Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate prediction accuracy of aGG and admission glucose on outcome measures. Multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the value of aGG in predicting in-hospital poor composite outcome and death.Results: Elevated aGG at or above 30 mg/dL was identified in 79 (66.4%) of patients. Vasospasm was not associated with the elevated aGG. Admission GG correlated with admission serum glucose (r = 0.94, p < 0.01), lactate (r = 0.41, p < 0.01), procalcitonin (r = 0.38, p < 0.01), and Hunt and Hess score (r = 0.51, p < 0.01), but not with HbA1c (r = 0.02, p = 0.82). Compared to admission glucose, aGG had a statistically significantly improved accuracy in predicting inpatient mortality (AUC mean ± SEM: 0.77 ± 0.05 vs. 0.72 ± 0.06, p = 0.03) and trended toward statistically improved accuracy in predicting poor composite outcome (AUC: 0.69 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.05, p = 0.07). When controlling for aSAH severity, aGG was not independently associated with delayed cerebral ischemia, poor composite outcome, and in-hospital mortality.Conclusion: Admission GG was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality or poor outcome in a population of aSAH. An aGG ≥30 mg/dL was common in our population, and further study is needed to fully understand the clinical importance of this biomarker.
Highlights
Glycemic gap (GG), as determined by the difference between glucose and the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-derived estimated average glucose, is associated with poor outcomes in various clinical settings
delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) was defined as persistent focal neurologic deficit attributed to vasospasm, or delayed infarct seen on CT or MRI not attributed to the initial bleed or subsequent procedures
We identified a total of 119 adult patients with a primary diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis
Summary
Glycemic gap (GG), as determined by the difference between glucose and the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-derived estimated average glucose (eAG), is associated with poor outcomes in various clinical settings. Our main objectives were to evaluate the association of admission glycemic gap (aGG) with in-hospital mortality and with poor composite outcome and to compare aGG’s predictive value to admission serum glucose. Glycemic gap (GG) is a measure of an acute derangement in glucose level in response to an active disease state, calculated by the difference between raw capillary glucose level and the estimated average glucose (eAG) derived from serum hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level. A retrospective study by Yang et al on acute ischemic stroke patients with diabetes showed that admission glycemic gap (aGG) was superior to admission glucose and HbA1c in predicting worse NIHSS and functional outcome at discharge [16]. The utility of GG in aSAH otherwise has not been fully established, especially in its association with hospital course and short-term outcome
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.