Abstract

BackgroundElevated blood eosinophil counts are linked to worse outcomes in asthma and COPD, but have yet to be well characterized in CF. We hypothesized that higher stable visit blood eosinophil counts are associated with increased rates of lung function decline and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of adult CF patients (≥19 years) enrolled from 2012 to 2018 in a prospective cohort study focused on blood biomarkers. We included individuals with at least one year of follow-up post-stable visit blood draw and compared clinical characteristics by blood eosinophil count (<300 cells/µL vs. ≥300 cells/µL). We used multivariate mixed-effects linear regression to estimate annual change in ppFEV1. Multivariable poisson and linear regression models were used to estimate rate of PEx requiring IV antibiotics and to compare CF Respiratory Symptom Diary-Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Scores (CFRSD-CRISS), respectively. ResultsOf 109 patients, 17 (15.6%) had eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and baseline ppFEV1, there was no association between high vs. low eosinophil group and rates of lung function decline (difference in slope -0.04%/y; 95% CI -1.5 to +1.4) or rates of PEx requiring IV antibiotics (IRR 1.46; 95% CI 0.75 to 2.65). The high eosinophil group had a higher mean CFRSD-CRISS score at stable visit (adjusted mean difference 9.3; 95% CI 2.9 to 16.0). ConclusionsThe high eosinophil group experienced increased respiratory symptoms, but the rates of lung function decline and PEx were comparable between groups.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call