Abstract

Background: Diet research focuses on the characteristics of “dietary patterns” regardless of the statistical methods used to derive them. However, the solutions to these methods are both conceptually and statistically different.Methods: We compared factor analysis (FA) and latent class analysis (LCA) methods to identify the dietary patterns of participants in the Chinese Wuxi Exposure and Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study that included 818 patients and 935 healthy controls. We examined the association between dietary patterns and plasma lipid markers and the breast cancer risk.Results: Factor analysis grouped correlated food items into five factors, while LCA classified the subjects into four mutually exclusive classes. For FA, we found that the Prudent-factor was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer [4th vs. 1st quartile: odds ratio (OR) for 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.95], whereas the Picky-factor was associated with a higher risk (4th vs. 1st quartile: OR for 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.81). For LCA, using the Prudent-class as the reference, the Picky-class has a positive association with the risk of breast cancer (OR for 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.90). The multivariate-adjusted model containing all of the factors was better than that containing all of the classes in predicting HDL cholesterol (p = 0.04), triacylglycerols (p = 0.03), blood glucose (p = 0.04), apolipoprotein A1 (p = 0.02), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p = 0.02), but was weaker than that in predicting the breast cancer risk (p = 0.03).Conclusion: Factor analysis is useful for understanding which foods are consumed in combination and for studying the associations with biomarkers, while LCA is useful for classifying individuals into mutually exclusive subgroups and compares the disease risk between the groups.

Highlights

  • The interest in dietary patterns is well-founded in nutritional epidemiology, in light of the limitation of the traditional singlenutrient approach [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Through examining the associations between dietary patterns and plasma lipid biomarkers, we found that the Prudentdietary pattern characteristic of cereal, aquatics, fruits, soy foods, and nuts in case of its derivation by latent class analysis (LCA) or factor analysis (FA) was inversely associated with triacylglycerols, blood glucose, and apolipoprotein B

  • When we compared a model containing all the classes with a model containing all the factors, we found that FA is slightly better than LCA in predicting some plasma lipid biomarkers (HDL cholesterol, triacylglycerols, blood glucose, apolipoprotein A1, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), while LCA is better than FA in predicting the breast cancer risk

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interest in dietary patterns is well-founded in nutritional epidemiology, in light of the limitation of the traditional singlenutrient approach [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In the “posterior” methods, FA simplifies the diet data into dietary patterns based on the correlation between foods. It postulates that the created statistical model can explain this correlation through a limited number of underlying factors, and give factor scores to individuals for all the derived factors [13, 14]. CA simplifies the diet data into dietary patterns based on the differences of individuals in the mean dietary intake, and each individual belongs to only one cluster [13, 16]. A novel CA method, latent class analysis (LCA) originating from psychology [17, 18], has been used in nutritional epidemiology [19, 20]. The solutions to these methods are both conceptually and statistically different

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.