Association between coronary atherosclerotic burden and all-cause mortality among patients undergoing exercise versus pharmacologic stress-rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

Abstract

Background and aimsPatients with suspected coronary artery disease who undergo stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and require pharmacologic stress are at substantially increased mortality risk compared to those who can exercise. However, the mechanisms underlying this increased risk are not well delineated. To test whether increased atherosclerotic burden accounts for this increased risk, we assessed the association between coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and mortality risk among patients undergoing exercise versus pharmacologic SPECT MPI. MethodsWe assessed all-cause mortality in 2,151 patients, followed for 12.2 ± 3.4 years, after undergoing stress-rest SPECT-MPI and CAC scanning within 3 months of each other. Patients were divided according to their mode of stress testing (exercise or pharmacologic). We further employed propensity analysis to create a subgroup of exercise and pharmacologic subgroups with comparable age, symptoms, and coronary risk factors. ResultsDespite greater age and worse clinical profiles, pharmacologic and exercise patients had similar CAC scores. However, the hazard ratio (95% CI) for mortality was substantially greater among pharmacologic patients: 2.39 (1.83–3.10). For each level of CAC abnormality, pharmacologic patients had >2-fold increased risk adjusted hazard ratio for all-mortality risk (p < 0.05 for each CAC level). Among propensity-matched exercise versus pharmacologic patients, the same findings were observed. ConclusionsAmong patients referred for stress-rest SPECT-MPI and CAC scoring, pharmacologic patients have substantially increased mortality risk compared to exercise patients, despite having comparable levels of coronary atherosclerosis.