Abstract

This is a retrospective study. The aim was to evaluate the influence of various decompression procedures on the incidence of C5 palsy (C5P). C5P is a well-known but unsolved complication of cervical spine surgery. Among anterior cervical decompressive procedures, both corpectomy and discectomy are important surgical methods, whose effects on the incidence of C5P are unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 818 patients (529 men; mean age: 59.2±11.6 y) who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The surgical choice to use corpectomy, discectomy, or hybrid decompression was based on standard treatment strategies depending on local compressive pathology and presenting clinical symptoms. We introduced an original "decompression combination score" as a means of quantifying the effects of the procedures on the development of C5P. The scores were based on the relative severity of various risk factors associated with the eventual development of C5P and were assigned as follows: C4 corpectomy, 1 point; C5 corpectomy, 1 point; C3 corpectomy successive to C4 corpectomy, 0.5 point; C6 or C7 corpectomy successive to C5 corpectomy, 0.5 point; C4/5 discectomy, 0.5 point; discectomy at another segment, 0 point. Each patient's decompression combination score was then comprised of the sum of these points. C5P occurred in 55 (47 men, mean age: 65.7±8.7 y) of the 818 (6.7%) patients. A larger number of operated disc segments was significantly associated with C5P. Higher decompression combination score was significantly associated with C5P. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, higher decompression combination score, and older age were significant risk factors. Corpectomy increased the incidence of C5P, while discectomy decreased the risk. The lower incidence of postoperative C5P after discectomy may be because of minimizing tethering effect to the C5 nerve root. As a preventive measure against C5P, corpectomy should be avoided, while discectomy is recommended as much as possible. Levels of Evidence: Step IV-Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.