Abstract

Background and Aims: It has recently emerged the concept of “obesity paradox,” a term used to describe an inverse association between obesity and clinical outcomes in cardiovascular diseases and stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture.Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with intracranial aneurysms from 21 medical centers in China. A total of 3,965 patients with 4,632 saccular intracranial aneurysms were enrolled. Patients were separated into unruptured (n = 1,977) and ruptured groups (n = 1,988). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between BMI and intracranial aneurysm rupture.Results: Compared to the patients with normal BMI (18.5 to < 24.0 kg/m2), the odds of intracranial aneurysm rupture were significantly lower in patients with BMI 24.0 to < 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.745, 95% CI = 0.638–0.868, P = 0.000) and patients with BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.628, 95% CI = 0.443–0.890, P = 0.009). Low BMI (<18.0 kg/m2) was not associated with intracranial aneurysm rupture (OR = 0.894, 95% CI = 0.483–1.657, P = 0.505). For males, both the BMI 24.0 to < 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.606, 95% CI = 0.469–0.784, P = 0.000) and the BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.384, 95% CI = 0.224–0.658, P = 0.001) were associated with a lower rupture risk, whereas the inverse association was not observed in females. Both the BMI 24.0 to < 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.722 for aged 50–60y, 95% CI = 0.554–0.938, P = 0.015; OR = 0.737 for aged >60y, 95% CI = 0.586–0.928, P = 0.009) and the BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.517 for aged 50–60y, 95% CI = 0.281–0.950, P = 0.0034; OR = 0.535 for aged >60y, 95% CI = 0.318–0.899, P = 0.0018) was associated with a lower rupture risk in patients aged ≥50 years, whereas the association was not significant in patients aged <50 years.Conclusions: Increased BMI is significantly and inversely associated with saccular intracranial aneurysm rupture in males and patients aged ≥50 years.

Highlights

  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a life-threatening subtype of stroke, leading to loss of many years of productive life owing to the high morbidity and mortality (Macdonald and Schweizer, 2017; Maher et al, 2020)

  • Compared to the patients with normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5 to < 24.0 kg/m2), the odds of intracranial aneurysm rupture were significantly lower in patients with BMI 24.0 to < 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.745, 95% CI = 0.638–0.868, P = 0.000) and patients with BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.628, 95% CI = 0.443–0.890, P = 0.009)

  • Low BMI (

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a life-threatening subtype of stroke, leading to loss of many years of productive life owing to the high morbidity and mortality (Macdonald and Schweizer, 2017; Maher et al, 2020). There is high agreement among neurosurgeons that older age, female sex, smoking, hypertension, multiple aneurysms, size, and location are among pivotal risk factors for rupture of an intracranial aneurysm (Wermer et al, 2007; Greving et al, 2014; Wang Y. et al, 2021). The prediction of the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture for individual patients is still poorly explored, and the search for new risk factors is urgently needed to continue, especially for aging patients. It has recently emerged the concept of “obesity paradox,” a term used to describe an inverse association between obesity and clinical outcomes in cardiovascular diseases and stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.