Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the relationship between BMI and blood pressure requires assessing whether this association is similar or differs across population groups. This study aimed to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure levels, and how these associations vary between socioeconomic groups and geographical settings.MethodsData from the National Demographic Health Survey of Peru from 2014 to 2019 was analyzed considering the complex survey design. The outcomes were levels of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the exposure was BMI. Exposure and outcomes were fitted as continuous variables in a non-linear quadratic regression model. We explored effect modification by six socioeconomic and geographical variables (sex, age, education level, socioeconomic position, study area, and altitude), fitting an interaction term between each of these variables and BMI.ResultsData from 159, 940 subjects, mean age 44.4 (SD: 17.1), 54.6% females, was analyzed. A third (34.0%) of individuals had ≥12 years of education, 24.7% were from rural areas, and 23.7% lived in areas located over 2,500 m above sea level. In the overall sample mean BMI was 27.1 (SD: 4.6) kg/m2, and mean SBP and DBP were 122.5 (SD: 17.2) and 72.3 (SD: 9.8) mmHg, respectively. In the multivariable models, greater BMI levels were associated with higher SBP (p-value < 0.001) and DBP (p-value < 0.001). There was strong evidence that sex, age, education level, and altitude were effect modifiers of the association between BMI and both SBP and DBP. In addition to these socio-demographic variables, socioeconomic position and study area were also effect modifiers of the association between BMI and DBP, but not SBP.ConclusionsThe association between BMI and levels of blood pressure is not uniform on a range of socio-demographic and geographical population groups. This characterization can inform the understanding of the epidemiology and rise of blood pressure in a diversity of low-resource settings.

Highlights

  • The number of adults living with raised blood pressure has increased from 594 million in 1975 to 1.13 billion in 2015 (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), 2017a); and this condition is responsible for 9.4 million deaths worldwide (Lim et al, 2012), disproportionally affecting low- and middle-income countries

  • This is of utmost importance as raises in body mass index (BMI) have been predominantly driven by increases in rural areas (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), 2019)

  • Information from 22,646 (11.1%) aged

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of adults living with raised blood pressure has increased from 594 million in 1975 to 1.13 billion in 2015 (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), 2017a); and this condition is responsible for 9.4 million deaths worldwide (Lim et al, 2012), disproportionally affecting low- and middle-income countries. The increases in the levels of blood pressure and BMI are two ongoing global phenomena observed in recent decades, and understanding the patterning of its linkages is required to better counter them This is of utmost importance as raises in BMI have been predominantly driven by increases in rural areas (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC), 2019). There was strong evidence that sex, age, education level, and altitude were effect modifiers of the association between BMI and both SBP and DBP In addition to these socio-demographic variables, socioeconomic position and study area were effect modifiers of the association between BMI and DBP, but not SBP. Conclusions: The association between BMI and levels of blood pressure is not uniform on a range of socio-demographic and geographical population groups This characterization can inform the understanding of the epidemiology and rise of blood pressure in a diversity of low-resource settings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call