Abstract

To date, ethical critiques of the use of assistive healthcare robotics have not closely examined the purported care relationship between such robots and their users. Drawing upon the work of care ethics scholars, I argue that authentic care relies upon capacities inherently reciprocal and responsive in nature, which ultimately precludes socially assistive robots from being useful caring tools.

Highlights

  • Care of a rapidly aging population has presented numerous challenges to health systems worldwide

  • This paper focuses on robotics technology that has been designed to carry out complex human-robot interactions

  • I have appealed to the limited nature of existing socially assistive robots (SARs) models to demonstrate that do they have restricted practical application in the completion of relevant caring tasks, but more fundamentally, that they will fall short in caring for human beings because they are non-human

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Care of a rapidly aging population has presented numerous challenges to health systems worldwide. The limited, pre-programmed interactive skills of SARs do not lend much confidence in their ability to recognize and respond to the personal factors that come to bear on a person’s care needs In light of this definition of care, I argue that socially assistive robots do not currently possess any of the capabilities required to provide substantial and comprehensive care, as discussed earlier, that addresses the care needs of the older adults they have been designed to assist. While one could argue that SARs can help carry out tasks that we recognize as part of traditional caring duties, current robots do not possess the shared humanity that makes possible things like “empathic witnessing, listening to the illness narrative, and providing moral solidarity through sustained engagement” (23 p.1551). Those providing care ought to possess the qualities and capabilities that allow them to appreciate the same caring comforts, and to recognize the ever-evolving care needs of the care receiver

CONCLUSION
Conflicts of Interest None to declare

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.