Abstract
The analysis of physical activity (PA) assistance programs is of major importance to ensure progress in the area. The Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) tool has been broadly disseminated in the literature. This study set out to identify PA assistance programs among Brazilian students and analyze them using the RE-AIM tool. The search was conducted in the Lilacs, SportDiscus, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhot, PsycINFO and PubMed databases. After thoroughly researching titles, abstracts and studies, 15 articles (seven PA assistance programs) were included. The programs were conducted in the past decade at public schools in the South and Southeast of Brazil. Multicomponent (education and teacher training) strategies were used with positive results in the practice of PA. With respect to the results of the RE-AIM tool, it was found that the most reported dimensions were "reach" (74%), followed by "efficacy" (48%), "adoption" (43%), "implementation" (35%) and "maintenance" (5%). The indicators most frequently mentioned were those related to the internal validity of the program: demographic and behavioral information of the target population, method of identification of the target population, sample size, participation rate and number of organizational units involved.
Highlights
Resumo Analisar programas de intervenção para atividade física (AF) é de grande importância para auxiliar o avanço na área
Quanto às dimensões do RE-AIM, verificou-se que “alcance” foi a mais relatada (74%), seguida de “efetividade/eficácia” (48%), “adoção” (43%), “implementação” (35%) e “manutenção” (5%)
Esse fato demonstra que os estudos de intervenção com foco na promoção da saúde raramente relatam os itens do RE-AIM referentes à validade externa, o que limita a extrapolação dos resultados para uma possível aplicação prática pelos gestores[12]
Summary
Foram localizados 1.287 artigos nas bases de dados, sendo que destes, 185 artigos foram excluídos pelo fato de serem duplicados. Dentre os 1.452 artigos que permaneceram 1.417 foram excluídos com base na leitura de títulos e resumos. Desta forma, foi realizada e leitura na íntegra de Lilacs. Referências excluídas por apresentarem títulos repetidos entre as oito bases de dados (n=185). 1 referência excluída pelo estudo por não ter sido realizado no Brasil . 2 referências excluídas por terem sido realizadas com populações especiais. 2 referências excluídas devido ao tipo de estudo (editorial e dissertação de mestrado)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
