Abstract

In 1918, Edgar Zilsel—a Marxist-Jewish philosopher who was soon to be exiled from Vienna—published a sociological study that later readers have found prescient of fascism. In Die Geniereligion (“The Religion of Genius”), Zilsel cautioned against the hidden dangers of elevating secular figures to the status of deities. As early as 1912, Zilsel was disturbed by how art-religion shaped music culture: his earliest published essay ruminated on timelessness and canonicity, on striving for heavenly tones while cast down to the earthly squalor of the concert hall. Indeed, in Zilsel’s Vienna, art-religion had come to dominate the music world—biographers made Beethoven a surrogate Christ, composers’ mementos circulated as relics, and historic houses became sites of pilgrimage. This article argues that Zilsel’s Geniereligion was not only an extension of his disdain for timelessness, but also bears subtle traces of Jewish disillusionment at the impossibility of assimilation to a secular arts culture. To enact their “civic self-improvement” (bürgerliche Verbesserung), Jews pursued educational self-cultivation (Bildung) that immersed them in the German national canon; and while this canon purported to be a secular neutral space, its Catholic practices of artist-veneration forced Jews to assimilate to a distinctly Christian brand of art-religion. When read against this cultural backdrop, Zilsel’s Geniereligion emerges as a subtle Jewish response to the promises and failures of secularity.

Highlights

  • Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr Part of the Cultural History Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, Jewish Studies

  • Zilsel’s polemic reveals the canon’s central irony, which manifests in art-religion (Kunstreligion): proponents of the canon positioned it as a secular “neutral space” for culture, but paradoxically, this neutral space was both inflected by Catholic practice, as Zilsel showed, and populated by Jewish artists and intellectuals such as Zilsel himself

  • While Schlick insisted that his circle was apolitical, and while he himself was descended from Prussian-Lutheran nobility, he was perceived as Jewish, or Jewadjacent

Read more

Summary

Abigail Fine University of Oregon

Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr Part of the Cultural History Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, Jewish Studies. Recommended Citation Fine, Abigail (2020) "Assimilating to Art-Religion: Jewish Secularity and Edgar Zilsel’s Geniereligion (1918)," Yale Journal of Music & Religion: Vol 6: No 2, Article 2. Cover Page Footnote I wish to thank August Sheehy and Margarethe Adams for organizing the symposium that was the impetus for this project. This article was greatly enriched by incisive commentary from three anonymous reviewers who engaged with the work in detail. I am further indebted to Roy Chan for his thoughtful comments on a draft of this article. This article is available in Yale Journal of Music & Religion: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yjmr/vol6/iss2/2

Abigail Fine
The New Real Church
Priests of the Geniereligion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.