Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies have compared risk–return characteristics of Islamic equity indices with their conventional counterparts, which may produce spurious results because a conventional equity index includes both Islamic and non‐Islamic constituents. Hence, this study compares Islamic equity portfolios with their non‐Islamic counterparts. We find that aggregate Islamic equity portfolios generally outperform non‐Islamic equity portfolios after controlling for the five asset pricing factors—market, size, value, profitability, and investment (Fama and French, 2015). The average cost of equity is 2.77 percentage points lower for Islamic firms compared to non‐Islamic firms. The findings hold for the various segments of the global equity market, and remain robust when the interest rate‐augmented and the liquidity factor‐augmented versions of the Fama–French five‐factor model are employed. The GRS test results suggest these asset pricing models may not be adequate for pricing both Islamic and non‐Islamic equities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.