Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to examine the cross-sectional connection between asset growth and stock returns in the international equity market during 2016-2020. Firms in international equity markets, subsequently experience lower stock returns with higher asset growth rates, consistent with the United States evidence. If capital markets are well-developed stocks efficiently priced then the negative AG effect on returns is likely to be stronger, but different to country characteristics representing accounting quality, investor protection, and limits to arbitrage. The research is to examine the cross-sectional connection between the asset growth and stock return in the international equity market is likely due to optimal investment effect than due to market timing, overinvestment, or other forms of mispricing. The evidence suggests that the cross-sectional association between the AG effect and stock return is more likely due to an optimal investment effect than due to overinvestment, mispricing or market timing. The findings of the research support Copper et al (2008) however, the weakening of the accounting quality decreases the AG effect magnitude which contradicts the mispricing-based arguments.

Highlights

  • It has been recognised that firms experiencing rapid growth by making capital investments and raising external financing subsequently have low stock returns, while firms experiencing contraction via debt retirement, share repurchase, and divestiture enjoy high future returns (Cooper et al, 2008)

  • This research prediction is consistent with the final hypothesis but the last evidence that stands against the hypothesis is the value weighted SPREAD and slope coefficient (SLOPE) provide strong positive effects of accounting quality index

  • This research suggested that weakening of the accounting quality decreases the asset growth (AG) effect magnitude which contradicts the mispricing-based arguments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been recognised that firms experiencing rapid growth by making capital investments and raising external financing subsequently have low stock returns, while firms experiencing contraction via debt retirement, share repurchase, and divestiture enjoy high future returns (Cooper et al, 2008). If discounted cash flow is equal to the value of any investment project that it generates, businesses will invest when they expect lower discount rates (risks) or higher future cash flows and this explanation is based on Tobin‟s (1969) and Yoshikawa‟s (1980) q-theory. Considering this theory, we expect that, asset growth should be negatively connected with future stock returns, as long as investment levels are negatively associated with potential discount rates to some extent.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call