Abstract

Gloves are used at workplaces to protect hands and fingers from potential hazards. Three types of work gloves were assessed in terms of the strength of grip, carrying, and lifting. Thirty adults (14 males and 16 females) joined as human participants. The strength data were measured under bare hand and three gloved conditions. The grip spans in the grip strength measurements included 45 mm, 55 mm, 65 mm, and 75 mm. The carrying strength was measured for both dominant and non-dominant hands under leg straight and semi-squat postural conditions. The lifting strength was measured at a semi-squat posture. The results showed that glove (p < 0.0001), grip span (p = 0.001), gender (p < 0.0001), and handedness (p < 0.0001) all affected grip strength significantly. Wearing the gloves tested in this study led to a decrease of grip strength up to 22.9%, on average, depending on gender, grip span, and hand tested. Wearing the cotton gloves led to a decrease of one-handed carrying strength ranged from 3.5% to 9.7% for female participants. All the participants took advantages in carrying strength when wearing the cut-resistant gloves. The leg lifting strength data indicated that the effects of the gloves were insignificant. The information of this study is beneficial for practitioners in the design of manual materials handling tasks concerning the use of work gloves.

Highlights

  • Abrasions, cuts, and bruises have been some of the leading causes of occupational injury

  • Results showed that the main(peffects of the grip span, handedness, and gloved conditions were all significant ongender, grip strength

  • Three work gloves were assessed in terms of the strength of grip, carrying, and lifting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cuts, and bruises have been some of the leading causes of occupational injury. 80% of the abrasions, cuts, and bruises lead to hand or finger injuries. Research [2], studying the incidences involving hand injuries for the US coal mine workers found that 18% of the total hand injuries were responsible for 84% of the total lost work days for the workers. The median lost workdays of those workers due to hand injuries were more than 30 days. Hand injuries lead to a substantial economic burden, with both high health-care expenditures and productive costs [4,5]. Hand protections at work are essential for both the safety and health of workers and for the welfare and well-beings of workers’ families [5]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call