Abstract
The purpose of this research is to build an application that is used for project evaluation and provide recommendations on project performance in local government agencies. In this study, project evaluation was carried out using the Group Decision Making (GDM) model based on the Group Decision Support System (GDSM) concept. The project output and outcome parameters used by the Decision Maker (DM) use a hybrid of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) methods to reduce subjectivity in scoring qualitative data and to determine project ratings from all DMs. Copeland Score voting method. The results of application computing on the implementation of Group Decision Support System (GDSS) and MCDM indicate that the project ranking process will be faster and more accurate. The results of the sensitivity test show that two criteria have a great influence on project performance so that they have a very important role in project evaluation.
Highlights
Projects in government agencies are part of the program, and consist of a set of actions to mobilize resources, either in the form of personnel (HR), capital goods including equipment and technology, funds, or a hybrid of some or all of these types of resources as inputs to produce outputs. in the form of goods/services
Measurement of project performance in government agencies, including the current project, has a weakness because it does not reflect the project evaluation that is generally carried out, which is only based on the percentage of achievement of the planned level of achievement of each project performance indicator as determined through the successful realization of the indicators in question [1]
The calculation of the percentage of achievement of the planned level of activity achievement used is based on the absorbed funds and the realization of output between the realization and the plan, which is stated in the administrative document of the Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP)
Summary
Projects in government agencies are part of the program, and consist of a set of actions to mobilize resources, either in the form of personnel (HR), capital goods including equipment and technology, funds, or a hybrid of some or all of these types of resources as inputs to produce outputs. in the form of goods/services. Measurement of project performance in government agencies, including the current project, has a weakness because it does not reflect the project evaluation that is generally carried out, which is only based on the percentage of achievement of the planned level of achievement of each project performance indicator as determined through the successful realization of the indicators in question [1]. The calculation of the percentage of achievement of the planned level of activity achievement used is based on the absorbed funds and the realization of output between the realization and the plan, which is stated in the administrative document of the Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP). Research conducted [2] developed a description of how to determine KPIs in ICT projects to get ideas and solutions in evaluating ICT projects
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
