Assessment of Two ‘Low-Tech’ Genetic Health Care Procedures Performed by Prenatal Care Providers in Washington State: Implications for Future Policy Development Activities

Abstract

Equity in health care demands that patients be treated fairly, impartially and with justice. Health care professionals and others have long been aware of the concept of equity, and the many inequities that exist in our health care cystem. As part of our analysis of postpartum data collected between 1993 and 1996 by the Washington Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from self-administered patient surveys, we explored equity as it pertains to two ‘low-tech’ prenatal genetic health care procedures: (1) whether or not prenatal care providers asked their patients about a family history of birth defects/genetic disorders, and (2) whether or not prenatal care providers talked to their patients about prenatal testing for birth defects/genetic disorders. Overall, about 80% of pregnant women reported that they had been asked about their family history of birth defects/genetic disorders, and about 85% said that their prenatal care provider(s) had talked to them about prenatal testing. Maternal characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of receiving these two low-tech genetic health care procedures appeared to be young maternal age, and low education and income levels, regardless of where women with these attributes received their prenatal care (e.g. community, migrant, health department or military health care clinics, private physicians, or health maintenance organizations).