Abstract
Abstract To model the interaction between a buried pipeline and the surrounding soil either special interface elements or thin conventional elements may be used. In this study the CRISP90 interface element, the DRCRISP interface element and a conventional 8-noded quadrilateral element have been examined and their behaviour compared for a variety of loading conditions. Initial studies reveal that all these elements have limitations and are only suitable for monotonic loading and situations where tensile conditions do not occur across the interface. In the light of these findings the CRISP90 interface element has been modified by introducing a limiting adhesive strength in the normal direction; a flag system has also been introduced to track the various conditions of separation and closure for any gap that is formed. The results of single element and other benchmark tests show that the modified element can satisfactorily model the different modes of deformation relevant to soil–structure interface problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
