Abstract

Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USV) are increasingly used to perform numerous tasks connected with measurements in inland waters and seas. One of such target applications is hydrography, where traditional (manned) bathymetric measurements are increasingly often realized by unmanned surface vehicles. This pertains especially to restricted or hardly navigable waters, in which execution of hydrographic surveys with the use of USVs requires precise maneuvering. Bathymetric measurements should be realized in a way that makes it possible to determine the waterbody’s depth as precisely as possible, and this requires high-precision in navigating along planned sounding profiles. This paper presents research that aimed to determine the accuracy of unmanned surface vehicle steering in autonomous mode (with a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller) along planned hydrographic profiles. During the measurements, a high-precision Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning system based on a GNSS reference station network (positioning accuracy: 1–2 cm, p = 0.95) and a magnetic compass with the stability of course maintenance of 1°–3° Root Mean Square (RMS) were used. For the purpose of evaluating the accuracy of the vessel’s path following along sounding profiles, the cross track error (XTE) measure, i.e., the distance between an USV’s position and the hydrographic profile, calculated transversely to the course, was proposed. The tests were compared with earlier measurements taken by other unmanned surface vehicles, which followed the exact same profiles with the use of much simpler and low-cost multi-GNSS receiver (positioning accuracy: 2–2.5 m or better, p = 0.50), supported with a Fluxgate magnetic compass with a high course measurement accuracy of 0.3° (p = 0.50 at 30 m/s). The research has shown that despite the considerable difference in the positioning accuracy of both devices and incomparably different costs of both solutions, the authors proved that the use of the GNSS RTK positioning system, as opposed to a multi-GNSS system supported with a Fluxgate magnetic compass, influences the precision of USV following sounding profiles to an insignificant extent.

Highlights

  • The main goal of the bathymetric measurements of a waterbody is to collect and measure data on its depth, and subsequently, preparation of charts securing the safety of vessels’ navigation in a given area [1]

  • Following the calculation of the distance between the planned routes and the ways travelled by the Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USV), it was possible to conduct a statistical analysis of this variable [4,51]

  • Identical measurements were carried out on 7 March 2019 using an USV of HyDrone, which was navigated in an autonomous mode using a popular autopilot (Pixhawk) and a Global Positioning System (GPS)/GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS) u-blox NEO-M8N

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main goal of the bathymetric measurements of a waterbody is to collect and measure data on its depth, and subsequently, preparation of charts securing the safety of vessels’ navigation in a given area [1]. From the technical point of view, they require two measurement systems: bathymetric—providing for precise depth measurement with a single- or multi-beam echosounder [8] and positional—based on positioning with the use of various Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) solutions: . Real Time Kinematic (RTK) or Real Time Network (RTN) Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) (positioning accuracy: 2DRMS = 2 m, p = 0.95) [12,13,14]. Multi-GNSS receivers (positioning accuracy: 2DRMS = 5–8 m, p = 0.95) [11,15] Depending on the waterbody depth, hydrographic surveys may be executed manually (in waterbodies up to 1 m depth) [3,4] or with the use of specialized vessels [5,6,7].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call