Assessment of the Production Variability and Composite Performance Index for Conventional and High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Balanced Mix Design Mixtures

Abstract

The balanced mix design (BMD) concept enables the design of engineered mixtures containing conventional and high reclaimed asphalt pavement (HRAP) contents, moving beyond the constraints of traditional volumetric design methodologies. During production, the designed mixture undergoes verification and potential modifications at the plant to accommodate actual production and field circumstances, regardless of the mix design method. This study assessed the impact of production and associated performance variability on a volumetrically designed control mixture and five mixtures designed with the BMD concept. This investigation showed relatively precise gradation control, but exceedances of volumetric property tolerances were observed in BMD-optimized mixtures during production. Performance, including durability, cracking, and rutting susceptibility, was evaluated using the Cantabro test, indirect tensile cracking test (IDT-CT), and asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) test, respectively. Test results uncovered that produced mixtures may become unbalanced. Observations from the Cantabro test and IDT-CT highlighted the necessity and effectiveness of employing the BMD for HRAP mixtures. The potential aging effect introduced during the reheating process may compromise durability and cracking resistance. In addition, a three-dimensional plot with a revised composite performance index (CPIR) was used to optimize the process of evaluating the mixture “balance” status among multiple primary performances. It revealed that almost all produced HRAP mixtures demonstrated a well-balanced status. Finally, agencies can use the CPIR as part of their acceptance program for BMD mixtures to determine a pay factor for possible bonuses or penalties.