Abstract

The article treats about the analysis and assessment of the financial condition of enterprises. Eight discriminatory methods were verified in terms of their predictive efficacy data from a sample of 50 companies from the period of 3 years of activity, which recently showed a net loss for the business. In accordance with the principle of objectivity, of the sample included companies from various industries, profile, action and different sizes of owned assets and reported turnover during the period. The results presented in order of predictive credibility and discriminatory methods tested are the most commonly used by researchers associated with the field of financial analysis. The results were confronted with a synthetic method classifying analyzed data against market competition. The value of the discriminatory models are very diverse. Therefore, as a verifier the Points of Banking Risk Assessment Methods proposed by Arthur Holda were presented. The confrontation of the results obtained with the models and methods of discriminatory banking provides a summary of the article and an assessment of the reliability of the presented models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.