Abstract

BackgroundInsecticide use is an important component of integrated pest management strategies developed for fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda J.E Smith, control in maize in many African countries. Here, the optimum number of synthetic insecticide and biopesticide applications needed to effectively manage FAW at a minimal cost in maize was studied.Materials and methodsA 3 × 4 factorial experiment arranged in a split plot design was used. Insecticides [Neem seed oil (NSO), 3% Azadirachtin); Emastar 112 EC (emamectin benzoate 48 g/L + acetamiprid 64 g/L); Eradicoat (282 g/L Maltodextrin)] were on the main plots, while insecticide spraying regimes [untreated control, spraying once (at VE–V5 maize develoment stage), twice (at VE–V5 and V6–V12 stages), thrice (at VE–V5, V6–V12 and V12–VT stages), four times (at VE–V5, V6–V12, V12–VT and R1–R3 stages)] were on the sub-plots.ResultsThe results showed that larval infestations were generally lower in Emastar 112 EC treated maize than in those sprayed with Eradicoat or NSO. Infestations were higher in the untreated control (no spray) but decreased with increases in number of spray applications in insecticide treated plots. Again, crop damage was low in Emastar 112 EC treated maize. This variable also decreased with an increase in the number of spray applications. Grain yield was significantly affected by the spraying regime only, with this variable being lowest in the untreated control. In both years, yields were at least 1.5-fold higher in maize sprayed twice, thrice or four times compared to the untreated control. Emastar 112 EC had the highest net economic benefits. A single spray of Emastar 112 EC at the VE–V5 maize development stage resulted in maximum profits, while two sprays (i.e., at VE–V5 and V6–V12 stages) were needed for Eradicoat and NSO.ConclusionHence, synthetic insecticides and biopesticides require different frequency of spray applications for cost effective management of FAW in northern Ghana. These findings are potentially applicable in other sub-Saharan African countries where this pest is present.

Highlights

  • This work did not directly measure the ovicidal effects of the insecticides tested, we infer that the reduction in neonates/larval abundance, especially in Emasrtar 112 EC treatments and to a limited extent neem seed oil (NSO) was partly contributed by this property of those insecticides

  • This study reports that a single round of insecticide spray to protect maize during the first infestation threshold of fall armyworm (FAW) at the early whorl stage (VE–V5) and perhaps, a repeat spray at the initial phase of the late whorl stage (V6–V12) were adequate to fully protect the crop

  • In conclusion, the results of the present study confirms that biopesticides are as effective as synthetic ones in mitigating FAW damage in maize

Read more

Summary

Introduction

FAW feeds on young leaf whorls, ears, tassels and eventually kill the whole maize plant by cutting through the base of seedlings (Goergen et al 2016). This pest has become a serious threat to maize production in Africa, due to the availability of a diverse range of host plants throughout the year and favourable climatic conditions for its growth and development (Montezano et al 2018). Insecticide use is an important component of integrated pest management strategies developed for fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda J.E Smith, control in maize in many African countries. The optimum number of synthetic insecticide and biopesticide applications needed to effectively manage FAW at a minimal cost in maize was studied

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call