Assessment of the exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in users of various tobacco/nicotine products by suitable urinary biomarkers.

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) occur naturally (bitumen and oils) and are formed during all incomplete combustions of organic materials. PAH exposure sources are manifold and include specific workplaces, ambient air, various foodstuffs, tobacco smoke and some medications. At least four members of this class of chemicals have been classified as proven or probable human carcinogens. Assessment of the exposure to PAHs with suitable methods is of importance, particularly in users of new-generation tobacco/nicotine products, which are intended to replace combustible cigarettes (CCs), a major source of non-occupational exposure to PAHs. In a clinical study comprising a period of 74h under confinement, we investigated the exposure to naphthalene (Nap), fluorene (Flu), phenanthrene (Phe), pyrene (Pyr) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) by measuring urinary monohydroxy-PAH (OH-PAH) derived from these parent compounds in habitual users of CCs, electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). Non-users (NU) of any tobacco/nicotine products served as (negative) control group. Smokers exhibited the highest levels for all PAH biomarkers measured, almost all of which were significantly different from the NU and user groups of all other products investigated. CC smokers were the only group which showed a significant relationship between almost all PAH biomarkers and dose markers such as daily consumption, urinary nicotine equivalents (Nequ) and plasma cotinine (CotP). The ratios in urinary OH-PAH between CC and all other groups were dependent on the biomarker and range from < 2 to > 10. These ratios could at least partly be explained by the enzymes involved, their region-selectivity and inducibility by smoking. In conclusion, cigarette smokers (CC) were the only group, which showed product use dependent exposure to PAHs, whereas users of EC, HTP, NRT and OT were not distinguishable from NU of any tobacco/nicotine products.