Abstract
The aim: To compare the efficiency of analgetic action of Ultrasound-guided FICB and prolonged EA as the components of perioperative multimodal analgesia in ERAS-structure in obese patients undergoing THR. Materials and methods: The retrospective study included 80 patients with obesity, who underwent elective anterolateral THR under conditions of low-flow inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane in combination with PEA (n1=38) or with FICB (n2=42). Primary endpoints: VAS pain level during the first postoperative day. Results: Static and dynamic VAS pain scores were similar in both groups during the first 6 hours. Since the 8th postoperative hour, there was a statistically significant increase in both static and dynamic VAS pain scores in the FICB group. A significant difference in static and dynamic VAS pain scores was obtained with a trend toward an increase in the PEA group within 48 hours (p < 0.05). Conclusions: USG- FICB is an effective, practically feasible, minimally invasive and safe regional method for eleclive anterior-lateral THR and can be an alternative to PEA in obese patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
