Abstract
To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the effective dose for conventional CT (SEQ and SCT) was estimated with a mathematical phantom. For CT investigation of the chest and abdomen the dose was highest for the EBT (11 mSv and 25 mSv, respectively) and slightly lower for the SEQ (7.8 mSv and 21.5 mSv, respectively), whereas spiral CT required the least dose (5.3 mSv and 8.8 mSv, respectively). For coronary calcium screening (0.8 mSv) and EBT coronary angiography (1.7 mSv) the dose was lower than for coronary catheter angiography (3.3 mSv). For conventional CT the difference between the effective dose derived by the mathematical phantom and by the Alderson phantom was 2% to 20%. For investigations of the chest and abdomen the effective dose applied by SCT is significantly lower than that with EBT and SEQ. For investigation of the coronary arteries the effective dose applied by EBT is lower than that for coronary catheter angiography.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.