Abstract

Producing manure-based fertilizers (MBFs) with specific nutrient ratios is a solution to overpassing the imbalance of nitrogen and phosphorus in manures, and a way to recycle manure’s nutrients, promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Several MBFs with different tailored N:P ratios (0.5:1, 1:1 and 2:1) were produced to determine their agronomic value in a pot experiment with oat (0.5:1 ratio: cattle manure with pig slurry (CaM+PiS), cattle manure with poultry manure (CaM+PoM) and poultry manure with superphosphate (PoM+SP); 1:1 ratio: poultry manure with cattle slurry (PoM+CaS) and poultry manure with pig slurry (PoM+PiS); 2:1 ratio: cattle slurry with the liquid fraction of cattle slurry (CaS+CaS-LIQ), pig slurry with the liquid fraction of pig slurry (PiS+PiS-LIQ) and poultry manure with urea (PoM+U)). The performance of these MBFs was compared with conventional mineral fertilizers (MFs) in sandy soils (Haplic Arenosols) with different nutrient requirements. Oat fertilized with PoM+SP (0.5:1) and PoM+PiS (1:1) led to yields similar to those obtained with the use of MFs (6.3 and 7.2 mg DM, respectively). The MBFs PoM+SP and PoM+PiS, as well as PiS+PiS-LIQ (2:1), were agronomically equivalent to the MFs. N uptake with those MBFs was equivalent to that obtained with the MFs. Replacing MFs with MBFs in the basal fertilization of oat was demonstrated to be a solution to turn agriculture more sustainable by recycling nutrients efficiently.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.