Assessment of Surgical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Geriatric Patients.

Abstract

Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgery, especially in the elderly population. However, the decision to perform surgery in elderly patients can be challenging due to higher complication rates. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is less commonly used in the elderly population despite its advantages. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and advantages of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively compared the preoperative and postoperative (PO) data and Short Form-36 (SF-36) forms of elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal and open inguinal hernia surgery. The primary outcomes were PO pain scores and complication rates. Results: A total of 79 patients with an age range between 65 and 86 years, who presented with inguinal hernias to Cekirge State Hospital's General Surgery Department between January 2017 and November 2019, were included. Seventy-nine patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique and Lichtenstein hernia repair. The laparoscopic group had a lower rate of PO complications and less analgesic medication consumption and usage time compared with the open group. Furthermore, compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group had lower PO pain scores and higher SF-36 scores for physical function, physical role, pain, and general health at the 30th and 90th days after surgery. Conclusion: Our study suggests that laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery can be safely performed in elderly patients with lower complication rates and faster recovery times compared with open surgery. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery, such as lower PO pain scores and faster recovery times, were also observed in elderly patients.