Abstract

The Chesapeake Bay and its surrounding tributaries are home to over 3,600 species of plants and animals. In order to assess the health of the region, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) monitors various parameters, such as dissolved oxygen, with monitoring stations located throughout the tidal waterways. Utilizing data provided by DNR, we assessed the waterways for areas of water quality concern. We analyzed the percentage of the readings taken for each parameter that failed to meet the threshold values and used the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test to determine the statuses of the stations. In order to assess the applicability of the Wilcoxon Test given the positive skew in the data, a simulation was performed. This simulation demonstrated that log-transforming the data prior to performing the Wilcoxon Test was not enough to reduce the Type I Error to reasonable levels. Thus, our team developed a relative ranking using a set of multiple comparison methods: a version of the Tukey Test on variance-transformed proportions, the Bonferroni adjustment method, a Bayesian method, and the Benjamini-Hochberg rejection method. From the ranking results we identified when each ranking technique is most applicable to our data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call