Abstract

We validate and test two algorithms for the time integration of the Boussinesq form of the Navier—Stokes equations within the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methodology for turbulent flows. The algorithms are implemented in the OpenFOAM framework. From one side, we have implemented an energy-conserving incremental-pressure Runge–Kutta (RK4) projection method for the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations together with a dynamic Lagrangian mixed model for momentum and scalar subgrid-scale (SGS) fluxes; from the other side we revisit the PISO algorithm present in OpenFOAM (pisoFoam) in conjunction with the dynamic eddy-viscosity model for SGS momentum fluxes and a Reynolds Analogy for the scalar SGS fluxes, and used for the study of turbulent channel flows and buoyancy-driven flows. In both cases the validity of the anisotropic filter function, suited for non-homogeneous hexahedral meshes, has been studied and proven to be useful for industrial LES. Preliminary tests on energy-conservation properties of the algorithms studied (without the inclusion of the subgrid-scale models) show the superiority of RK4 over pisoFoam, which exhibits dissipative features. We carried out additional tests for wall-bounded channel flow and for Rayleigh–Bènard convection in the turbulent regime, by running LES using both algorithms. Results show the RK4 algorithm together with the dynamic Lagrangian mixed model gives better results in the cases analyzed for both first- and second-order statistics. On the other hand, the dissipative features of pisoFoam detected in the previous tests reflect in a less accurate evaluation of the statistics of the turbulent field, although the presence of the subgrid-scale model improves the quality of the results compared to a correspondent coarse direct numerical simulation. In case of Rayleigh–Bénard convection, the results of pisoFoam improve with increasing values of Rayleigh number, and this may be attributed to the Reynolds Analogy used for the subgrid-scale temperature fluxes. Finally, we point out that the present analysis holds for hexahedral meshes. More research is need for extension of the methods proposed to general unstructured grids.

Highlights

  • Since the seminal works of Chorin [1] and Temam [2], different variants of the fractional-step method have been proposed and used for the integration of the incompressible form of the unsteadyNavier–Stokes Equations (NSE)

  • The dissipative features of pisoFoam detected in the previous tests reflect in a less accurate evaluation of the statistics of the turbulent field, the presence of the subgrid-scale model improves the quality of the results compared to a correspondent coarse direct numerical simulation

  • Even non-conservative or dissipative numerical algorithms may give reasonable results when used for Direct NumericalSimulations (DNS), provided that the time step of the simulation and the cell size are smaller than the Kolmogorov scales, so that the truncation error remains confined in the insignificant part of the power spectrum

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the seminal works of Chorin [1] and Temam [2], different variants of the fractional-step method have been proposed and used for the integration of the incompressible form of the unsteady. In an attempt to remedy the over-dissipative properties of pisoFoam, various authors [15,16] have implemented non-incremental projection methods for the solution of the incompressible NSE in OpenFOAM All such works consider the Rhie–Chow interpolation for the momentum fluxes projected onto the faces, in order to guarantee velocity-pressure coupling on the discrete PDE system. There, the authors propose to project in time the face fluxes of momentum, in an attempt to mitigate the error caused by the splitting of the non-linear term in PISO Please note that the former remark is not new: the original work of Issa [9] shows that the operator-splitting in time is only first-order accurate.

Mathematical Formulation
Turbulence Modeling
Numerical Formulations
PISO Algorithm
Runge–Kutta Algorithm
Verification of Conservation Properties
The Two-Dimensional Inviscid Taylor Vortex
Hydrodynamic Instabilities
LES of Turbulent Flows
LES of Turbulent Poiseuille Flow
LES of Rayleigh–Benard Convection
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call