Abstract

BackgroundThe changes in land use and land cover have a strong effect on the total soil organic carbon, its fractions and its overall soil health. This study carried out in Olesharo Catchment, Kenya, was to quantify the differences in total organic carbon (TOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), mineral organic carbon (MOC) and carbon management index (CMI) among four land use types: grasslands, shrublands, agricultural lands and barelands. It was also purported to evaluate the use of CMI as an indicator for soil degradation or improvement in response to land use and land cover changes.ResultsThe results of the study show that the mean values of TOC, POC and MOC are significantly different between land use types. Thus, shrublands have significantly higher TOC (22.26 g kg−1) than grasslands (10.29 g kg−1) and bare lands (7.56 g kg−1). They also have significantly higher POC (7.79 g kg−1) and MOC (10.04 g kg−1) than all the other land use types. The agricultural lands have higher CMI than grasslands (53% vs 41% relative to shrublands) suggesting that grasslands face serious degradation through overgrazing.ConclusionsThis study shows that different land use types have an influence on soil organic carbon pools, and consequently on the CMI, the CMI could be used as an indicator for soil degradation or improvement in response to land use and land cover changes.

Highlights

  • The changes in land use and land cover have a strong effect on the total soil organic carbon, its frac‐ tions and its overall soil health

  • Mineral organic matter The mineral organic carbon (MOC) was higher than the particulate organic carbon (POC) in all the land use types

  • This study shows that different land use types have an influence on soil organic carbon pools and the carbon manage‐ ment index (CMI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The changes in land use and land cover have a strong effect on the total soil organic carbon, its frac‐ tions and its overall soil health. Soil organic carbon (SOC) has recently gained prominence in assessment of soil quality since it compoundly affects chemical, physical and biological aspects of the soil. Though described by some as the least most understood component of the soil because of its dynamism, [2] SOC has been linked to its potential role in carbon sequestration through proper management of land use and cover types [3]. Labile fraction has been described in various ways by soil scientists, including particulate organic carbon (POC) (53–2000 μm), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) (density of < 2.0 g cm−2), readily oxidized carbon (ROC) ( oxidized by potassium permanganate), soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), etc. Labile fraction has been described in various ways by soil scientists, including particulate organic carbon (POC) (53–2000 μm), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) (density of < 2.0 g cm−2), readily oxidized carbon (ROC) ( oxidized by potassium permanganate), soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), etc. [9,10,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call