Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of two dependent measures, (1) counting of pathologic movements (CPM) and (2) the Sitting Assessments Scale (SAS). The measures were intended for use in clinical physiotherapy practice, to provide both quantifiable and qualitative information from videofilm concerning functional sitting in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Two separate groups of final term physiotherapy students (three students in each group) tested one technique each for interrater reliability. The SAS-measure also was tested for interrater reliability. Videofilm of twelve children with CP ranging in age from 2 to 16 years were assessed. The students' results were compared to earlier results by experiences physiotherapist. The results demonstrated excellent interrater reliability for SAS (p<0.001) and good interrater reliability for the CPM technique. The degree of user experience seems to play a role in the use of the CPM measure. Considering evaluation of postural control and functional performance over all, SAS appears to be superior to CPM.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
