Assessment of significant harm: improving professional practice

Abstract

Judging whether a child is suffering or is likely to suffer ‘significant harm’ has become a critical task for professionals working in the field of child health. Yet little guidance is available about what the phrase means in its entirety or how it should be applied in practice. This study set out to clarify the position by examining how the phrase was used in practice by a selected sample of experienced health and social work staff. The evidence collected suggests flaws in the general approach adopted by professionals to identification and assessment in child protection cases. The data indicate a heavy concentration of attention on the weaknesses of families being assessed rather than their strengths and on parents rather than children. Problems are identified in responding effectively to long-term, chronic abuse such as emotional abuse and neglect.