Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films.

Abstract

A radiographic examination is an essential part of the diagnostic process in orthodontics. However, what radiographs are needed to properly evaluate root shape and position? Most clinicians order panoramic or periapical radiographs in addition to the cephalometric radiograph. The purpose of this study was to find out whether one type of film is more accurate than the other in the pretreatment evaluation of root shape and the posttreatment computation of apical root resorption. Pretreatment and posttreatment panoramic films and full-mouth periapical films from 42 patients who completed fixed orthodontic treatment were assessed for tooth length and root shape. Panoramic films showed significantly greater average apicaL root resorption than periapical films for the 743 teeth surveyed. The greatest differences were found in the lower incisors, the least in the maxillary incisors. Classification of root shape was significantly different between the 2 types of radiographs. Root dilacerations and other abnormal shapes, clearly visible on periapical films, often appeared normal on panoramic films. The findings strongly suggest that root shape is much harder to assess on panoramic films. We conclude that, in cases where the apices are obscured or other factors are present that might suggest higher risk for root resorption or vertical bone loss, periapical films should be ordered. The use of panoramic films to measure pre- and posttreatment root resorption may overestimate the amount of root loss by 20% or more.