Abstract

Background: Criticisms that generic measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are not sensitive to impairment in anorexia nervosa (AN) has spurred the development of disease-specific measures. This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of a generic to a disease-specific measure of HRQoL. Methods: 63 participants with AN completed measures of a generic HRQoL (SF-12), disease-specific HRQoL (Eating Disorders Quality of Life Questionnaire; EDQOL), functional impairment (days out of role; DOR; Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS), and eating disorder severity (Eating Disorder Examination; EDE) at baseline, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-months follow-up. Cronbach’s α was computed for the SF-12 and EDQOL (internal consistency). Correlations were assessed between SF-12/EDQOL scores and DOR, WSAS, and EDE scores (convergence validity). Three sets of three multiple linear regressions were performed using SF-12 and EDQOL scores as predictors and change in DOR, WSAS, and EDE global scores from baseline to (i) post-treatment, (ii) 6-month follow-up, (iii) and 12-month follow-up as dependent variables (predictive validity and sensitivity). Results: The EDQOL displayed stronger internal consistency (α = 0.92) than the SF-12 (α = 0.80). The SF-12 converged more strongly with DOR and the WSAS (rp = �0.31 to �0.63 vs. 0.06 to 0.70), while the EDQOL converged more strongly with the EDE (rp = �0.01 to 0.48 vs. -0.01 to �0.37). The SF-12 demonstrated stronger predictive validity (β = �0.55 to 0.29) and sensitivity to changes in ED severity (β = �0.47 to 0.32). Conclusions: The SF-12 is a valid and sensitive measure of HRQoL impairment in patients with AN. While the SF-12 may be preferred in research comparing EDs to other populations, and in research and practice as an indicator of functional impairment; the EDQOL may be preferred by clinicians and researchers interested in HRQoL impairment specifically associated with an ED and as an additional indicator of ED severity.

Highlights

  • Assessment of quality of life in people with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a comparison of generic and specific instruments

  • The SF-12 and EDQOL were compared on internal consistency, convergence validity, and criterion-related validity

  • May be preferable in studies where comparisons are to be made with other populations. This abstract was presented in the Anorexia Nervosa Characteristics and Treatment stream of the 2013 ANZAED Conference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Assessment of quality of life in people with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: a comparison of generic and specific instruments Deborah Mitchison1*, Phillipa Hay2,3, Scott Engel4, Ross Crosby4, Daniel Le Grange5, Hubert Lacey6, Jonathan Mond7,8, Shameran Slewa-Younan9, Stephen Touyz10 From 2013 ANZAED Conference: Inspiring Change: Person and Context Melbourne, Australia.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.