Abstract

Current breast tumor margin detection methods are destructive, time-consuming, and result in significant reoperative rates. Dual-modality photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and ultrasound has the potential to enhance breast margin characterization by providing clinically relevant compositional information with high sensitivity and tissue penetration. However, quantitative methods that rigorously compare volumetric PAT and ultrasound images with gold-standard histology are lacking, thus limiting clinical validation and translation. Here, we present a quantitative multimodality workflow that uses inverted Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy (iSPIM) to facilitate image co-registration between volumetric PAT-ultrasound datasets with histology in human invasive ductal carcinoma breast tissue samples. Our ultrasound-PAT system consisted of a tunable Nd:YAG laser coupled with a 40 MHz central frequency ultrasound transducer. A linear stepper motor was used to acquire volumetric PAT and ultrasound breast biopsy datasets using 1100 nm light to identify hemoglobin-rich regions and 1210 nm light to identify lipid-rich regions. Our iSPIM system used 488 nm and 647 nm laser excitation combined with Eosin and DRAQ5, a cell-permeant nucleic acid binding dye, to produce high-resolution volumetric datasets comparable to histology. Image thresholding was applied to PAT and iSPIM images to extract, quantify, and topologically visualize breast biopsy lipid, stroma, hemoglobin, and nuclei distribution. Our lipid-weighted PAT and iSPIM images suggest that low lipid regions strongly correlate with malignant breast tissue. Hemoglobin-weighted PAT images, however, correlated poorly with cancerous regions determined by histology and interpreted by a board-certified pathologist. Nuclei-weighted iSPIM images revealed similar cellular content in cancerous and non-cancerous tissues, suggesting malignant cell migration from the breast ducts to the surrounding tissues. We demonstrate the utility of our nondestructive, volumetric, region-based quantitative method for comprehensive validation of 3D tomographic imaging methods suitable for bedside tumor margin detection.

Highlights

  • Current breast tumor margin detection methods are destructive, time-consuming, and result in significant reoperative rates

  • Ultrasound and photoacoustic tomography (PAT) images provided morphological and compositional information that was comparable to histology (Fig. 2a–c)

  • PAT images allowed for visualization of hemoglobin-rich regions via 1100 nm light (Fig. 2g–i) and lipid-rich adipose tissue via 1210 nm light (Fig. 2j–l)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current breast tumor margin detection methods are destructive, time-consuming, and result in significant reoperative rates. Dual-modality photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and ultrasound has the potential to enhance breast margin characterization by providing clinically relevant compositional information with high sensitivity and tissue penetration. Quantitative methods that rigorously compare volumetric PAT and ultrasound images with gold-standard histology are lacking, limiting clinical validation and translation. There is a clear clinical need to develop nondestructive intraoperative methods for rapid tumor margin detection to reduce reoperative rates and improve patient outcomes. Diffuse optical tomography has been developed for in vivo breast cancer characterization but lacks the necessary resolution required to assess tumor m­ argins[17,18] Other optical techniques, such as diffuse reflectance imaging, optical coherence tomography, and Raman spectroscopy can provide high-resolution images to better characterize breast tumor margins, but these methods generally have long image acquisition times and suboptimal penetration d­ epths[19–25]. These conflicting PAT reports may be partially due to a lack of robust co-registration methods to accurately compare histology or gold-standard clinical imaging results with photoacoustic imaging datasets at the same location

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.