Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures used in corneal transplantation: a systematic review

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to review all the articles that have implemented patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in corneal transplantation and discuss quality assessments of the PROMs. An extensive literature review was undertaken to identify all the studies that used PROMs to assess the QoL in corneal transplantation. Non-original or review articles, articles on other subject area and articles on cost-effectiveness/utility without PROM data/results were excluded. Each PROM was assessed against the following criteria: content development (item identification and item selection), psychometric properties, validity, reliability, and responsiveness. 425 articles were identified of which 35 articles were included in the final review. PROMs in corneal transplantation were used to (a) evaluate the QoL after surgery, (b) compare the QoL scores between different surgical techniques and (c) determine the relationship between QoL and objective measures such as visual acuity, visual field and stereoacuity. A total of 17 PROMs were used to assess QoL in corneal transplantation. Whilst this search did not produce any PROMs that were specifically designed to assess corneal transplantation, most studies were found to have employed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI VFQ 25). The Visual Function Index 14 (VF 14) performed better in the present quality assessment criteria compared to other PROMs, however, the NEI VFQ 25 and the VF 14 PROMs were not specifically developed for corneal transplantation and therefore the QoL assessment made using these PROMs may be incomplete. As improvements in various forms of lamellar transplantation surgery techniques such as UT-DSAEK and FT-DSAEK have resulted in better visual outcomes, improved graft survival and reduced complications, a corneal transplantation specific PROM will be useful in clinical settings to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques from the patient perspective.