Abstract

Donor organ shortage, growing waiting lists and substantial organ discard rates are key problems in transplantation. The critical importance of organ quality in determining long-term function is becoming increasingly clear. However, organ quality is difficult to predict. The lack of good measures of organ quality is a serious challenge in terms of acceptance and allocation of an organ. The underlying review summarizes currently available methods used to assess donor organ quality such as histopathology, clinical scores and machine perfusion characteristics with special focus on molecular analyses of kidney quality. The majority of studies testing molecular markers of organ quality focused on identifying organs at risk for delayed graft function, yet without prediction of long-term graft outcome. Recently, interest has emerged in looking for molecular markers associated with biological age to predict organ quality. However, molecular gene sets have not entered the clinical routine or impacted discard rates so far. The current review critically discusses the potential reasons why clinically applicable molecular quality assessment using early kidney biopsies might not have been achieved yet. Besides a critical analysis of the inherent limitations of surrogate markers used for organ quality, i.e., delayed graft function, the intrinsic methodological limitations of studies assessing organ quality will be discussed. These comprise the multitude of unpredictable hits as well as lack of markers of nephron mass, functional reserve and regenerative capacity.

Highlights

  • Good organ quality is the basis for successful long-term transplant outcome

  • This study indicated gene expression of inflammatory and fibrotic markers at 4 months, and differences between 4 months and baseline, correlated negatively with renal function up to 5 years

  • The majority of published studies on molecular assessment of organ quality used delayed graft function (DGF), i.e., transient renal failure immediately post-transplantation, as surrogate marker for graft quality and outcome. This is based on the association of reduced graft survival of DGF kidneys in standard brain death donors (DBD) shown in some, but not in all studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Good organ quality is the basis for successful long-term transplant outcome. The ability to withstand and repair immune and non-immune mediated injury and the number of nephrons to match the increased and persistent metabolic demand to a single kidney characterize optimal kidney organ quality with the potential to best long-term function. In case of doubt clinicians will err on the side of caution and decide on discarding the organ, despite organ shortage and growing waiting lists This is reflected in the high kidney discard rates in the US despite significant efforts to expand the donor pool. In Europe, where procurement biopsies are rarely performed, kidney discard rates are significantly lower and this is associated with saved patient life years [4, 5]. This difference between US and European allocation practice underscores the need for more reliable and objective methods for organ quality assessment, especially in marginal donors, to decrease the number of discarded organs.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call