Abstract

New technologies utilized for monitoring brain function can be more sensitive in the assessment of desired or undesired pharmacological effects than can clinical examination. Nonetheless, careful case-by-case analysis is required to determine to what extent a change detected with a sensitive imaging modality will have clinical significance. Whereas in some instances the technology may suggest a subclinical condition years before clinical signs develop, in other instances changes seen may be compensated for through system reserves, redundancy, or plasticity. Furthermore, simultaneous application of several assay instruments, including behavioral, electrophysiological, and nuclear medicine approaches, may be appropriate and useful for establishing correlations between changes in specific aspects of brain function and amelioration of a disease (drug abuse disorder) or its sequelae. In the example of ibogaine, a testing strategy was developed to assess human subjects for possible changes in cerebellar function (that were suggested by preclinical findings indicating subtle damage). Thus, subjects may be tested for subclinical alterations during and immediately following a clinical trial. This "harbinger of toxicity" approach would provide clinicians the critical data necessary for appropriate follow-up of subjects as well as the propriety of continuance of the clinical trials within the ibogaine project.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call