Abstract

Abstract. Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications v.2 (MERRA-2), Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Operational Analysis (CAMS-OA), and a high-resolution regional Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) were used to evaluate natural and anthropogenic particulate matter (PM) air pollution in the Middle East (ME) during 2015–2016. Two Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) retrievals – combined product Deep Blue and Deep Target (MODIS-DB&DT) and Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) – and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) aerosol optical depth (AOD) observations as well as in situ PM measurements for 2016 were used for validation of the WRF-Chem output and both assimilation products. MERRA-2 and CAMS-OA assimilate AOD observations. WRF-Chem is a free-running model, but dust emission in WRF-Chem is tuned to fit AOD and aerosol volume size distributions obtained from AERONET. MERRA-2 was used to construct WRF-Chem initial and boundary conditions both for meteorology and chemical and aerosol species. SO2 emissions in WRF-Chem are based on the novel OMI-HTAP SO2 emission dataset. The correlation with the AERONET AOD is highest for MERRA-2 (0.72–0.91), MAIAC (0.63–0.96), and CAMS-OA (0.65–0.87), followed by MODIS-DB&DT (0.56–0.84) and WRF-Chem (0.43–0.85). However, CAMS-OA has a relatively high positive mean bias with respect to AERONET AOD. The spatial distributions of seasonally averaged AODs from WRF-Chem, assimilation products, and MAIAC are well correlated with MODIS-DB&DT AOD product. MAIAC has the highest correlation (R=0.8), followed by MERRA-2 (R=0.66), CAMS-OA (R=0.65), and WRF-Chem (R=0.61). WRF-Chem, MERRA-2, and MAIAC underestimate and CAMS-OA overestimates MODIS-DB&DT AOD. The simulated and observed PM concentrations might differ by a factor of 2 because it is more challenging for the model and the assimilation products to reproduce PM concentration measured within the city. Although aerosol fields in WRF-Chem and assimilation products are entirely consistent, WRF-Chem is preferable for analysis of regional air quality over the ME due to its higher spatial resolution and better SO2 emissions. The WRF-Chem’s PM background concentrations exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines over the entire ME. Mineral dust is the major contributor to PM (≈75 %–95 %) compared to other aerosol types. Near and downwind from the SO2 emission sources, nondust aerosols (primarily sulfate) contribute up to 30 % to PM2.5. The contribution of sea salt to PM in coastal regions can reach 5 %. The contributions of organic matter, black carbon and organic carbon to PM over the Middle East are insignificant. In the major cities over the Arabian Peninsula, the 90th percentile of PM10 and PM2.5 (particles with diameters less than 10 and 2.5 µm, respectively) daily mean surface concentrations exceed the corresponding Kingdom of Saudi Arabia air quality limits. The contribution of the nondust component to PM2.5 is <25 %, which limits the emission control effect on air quality. The mitigation of the dust effect on air quality requires the development of environment-based approaches like growing tree belts around the cities and enhancing in-city vegetation cover. The WRF-Chem configuration presented in this study could be a prototype of a future air quality forecast system that warns the population against air pollution hazards.

Highlights

  • Particulate matter (PM) is a complex mixture of sea salt, sulfate, black carbon, organic matter, and mineral dust, suspended in the air

  • We evaluate aerosol outputs from MERRA2, Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Operational Analysis (CAMS-OA), and Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)-Chem over the Middle East (ME) against satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) observations as well as in situ PM2.5 and PM10 measurements during the 2015–2016 period, and we assess air pollution over the ME focusing on the following science questions: 1. How accurately do WRF-Chem, MERRA-2, and CAMS-OA capture the abundance of dust aerosol, its volume size, and its spatial distributions over the ME in comparison with Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and satellite observations?

  • This study evaluates MERRA-2 and CAMS-OA data assimilation products and high-resolution WRF-Chem simulations aimed at assessing the impact of aerosols on PM air pollution over the Middle East for the 2015–2016 period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Particulate matter (PM) is a complex mixture of sea salt, sulfate, black carbon, organic matter, and mineral dust, suspended in the air. We evaluate aerosol outputs from MERRA2, CAMS-OA, and WRF-Chem over the ME against satellite and ground-based AOD observations as well as in situ PM2.5 and PM10 measurements during the 2015–2016 period, and we assess air pollution over the ME focusing on the following science questions: 1. 5, the capabilities of WRFChem, MERRA-2, and CAMS-OA to simulate dust aerosol abundance over the ME are compared; the PM spatial distributions and PM air pollution in the major ME cities obtained from the WRF-Chem simulations are discussed.

Observational datasets
AERONET
Surface in situ PM observations
MERRA-2
CAMS-OA
WRF-Chem
Gas-phase chemistry and aerosols
WRF-Chem code modification
Regional climate and circulation
Aerosol volume size distributions
Comparison with AERONET AOD
Comparison of spatial AOD distributions
PM air pollution
Spatial patterns of PM air pollution
PM air pollution in the major ME cities
Conclusions
Meteorological boundary and initial conditions
Comparison of AERONET and WRF-Chem volume size distributions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call