Abstract
Bird, mammal and vascular plant species were censused in 200-m long plots at varying distances from six midorder streams in Vermont, USA to determine how wide corridors need to be to conserve biological richness. Use of stream corridors by most mammal species occurred below or just above the annual high water mark (HWM). Distribution of plant and bird species within corridors was more variable, however, and differed from stream to stream. For example, to include 90% of the streamside plant species, minimum corridor widths ranged from 10 to 30 m above HWM, depending on the stream. Minimum corridor widths of 75–175 m were needed to include 90% of the bird species. Thus, no standard minimum corridor width for conserving species was identified. Virtually all annual, biennial, non-native and ruderal (weedy) plant species were restricted to the streamside of HWM, suggesting that annually flooded zones may serve as refugia and travel corridors for these groups. No analagous relationships were identified for birds or mammals. In summary, distribution of species along streams varied greatly by taxon, stream, and location of the high water mark. Use of a standard corridor width to conserve species is a very poor substitute for individual, streamspecific assessments of species distributions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.