Abstract

The increased availability of commercially-available low-cost air quality sensors combined with increased interest in their use by citizen scientists, community groups, and professionals is resulting in rapid adoption, despite data quality concerns. We have characterized three out-the-box PM sensor systems under different environmental conditions, using field colocation against reference equipment. The sensor systems integrate Plantower 5003, Sensirion SPS30 and Alphasense OCP-N3 PM sensors. The first two use photometry as a measuring technique, while the third one is an optical particle counter. For the performance evaluation, we co-located 3 units of each manufacturer and compared the results against optical (FIDAS) and gravimetric (KFG) methods for a period of 7 weeks (28 August to 19 October 2020). During the period from 2nd and 5th October, unusually high PM concentrations were observed due to a long-range transport episode. The results show that the highest correlations between the sensor systems and the optical reference are observed for PM1, with coefficients of determination above 0.9, followed by PM2.5. All the sensor units struggle to correctly measure PM10, and the coefficients of determination vary between 0.45 and 0.64. This behavior is also corroborated when using the gravimetric method, where correlations are significantly higher for PM2.5 than for PM10, especially for the sensor systems based on photometry. During the long range transport event the performance of the photometric sensors was heavily affected, and PM10 was largely underestimated. The sensor systems evaluated in this study had good agreement with the reference instrumentation for PM1 and PM2.5; however, they struggled to correctly measure PM10. The sensors also showed a decrease in accuracy when the ambient size distribution was different from the one for which the manufacturer had calibrated the sensor, and during weather conditions with high relative humidity. When interpreting and communicating air quality data measured using low-cost sensor systems, it is important to consider such limitations in order not to risk misinterpretation of the resulting data.

Highlights

  • PM can have significant effects on human health, including asthma, lung cancer, and cardiovascular diseases

  • All the sensor units struggle to correctly measure PM up to 10 μm in diameter (PM10), and the coefficients of determination vary between 0.45 and 0.64. This behavior is corroborated when using the gravimetric method, where correlations are significantly higher for PM2.5 than for PM10, especially for the sensor systems based on photometry

  • The Air Quality Directive defines the type of instrumentation, the minimum number of monitoring stations, the target pollutants and the accuracy level required for the measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

PM can have significant effects on human health, including asthma, lung cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. PM up to 10 μm in diameter (PM10 ) is able to penetrate the bronchi, while PM with diameter up to 2.5 μm (PM2.5 ) can penetrate the lungs and enter the circulatory system [1]. PM concentrations are measured at air quality reference monitoring stations. In Europe, the requirements to set up an air quality monitoring station are defined in the EU Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC. The Air Quality Directive defines the type of instrumentation, the minimum number of monitoring stations, the target pollutants and the accuracy level required for the measurements. Due to the substantial costs associated with the setup and maintenance of such reference stations, the current monitoring network only offers monitoring at resolutions of 1–10 km in major European cities and neither offers universal sampling coverage nor street-scale monitoring

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.