Assessment of low salinity waterflooding in carbonate cores: Interfacial viscoelasticity and tuning process efficiency by use of non-ionic surfactant

Abstract

Hypothesis. A large number of papers discuss merits and mechanisms of low salinity waterflooding. For each mechanism proposed, there are counter examples to invalidate the stated mechanism. The effect of wettability from low salinity water, which is predominantly stated in literature as the dominant mechanism, may not be valid. We introduce a direct correlation between oil-brine interfacial viscoelasticity and oil recovery from waterflooding.Experiments. The oil recovery is investigated in carbonate rocks for three light crude oils, by injection of a wide range of aqueous phases, ranging from deionized water to very high salinity brine of 28 wt%, and low concentration of a non-ionic surfactant at 100 ppm. The oil-brine interfacial viscoelasticity is quantified and supplementary measurements of interfacial tension and wettability are performed.Findings. In our experiments, oil recovery is higher from high salinity water injection than from low salinity water injection. A strong relationship is observed between interface elasticity and oil recovery for different concentrations of salt in the injected brine as well as for ultra-low concentration surfactant. An elastic oil-brine interface results in high oil recovery. The surfactant molecule we have selected prefers the oil–water interface despite high solubility in the oil phase and makes ultra-low concentration of 100 ppm in injection water very effective. Contrary to widespread assertions in the literature, we find no definitive correlation between oil recovery and wettability.