Abstract

Performance assessment instruments of social competence perceptional built and developed based on theories of performance assessment of competence and on the basis of previous research within and outside the country. This research based on the theory of performance assessment of lecturers upon social competence posited perceptional performance lecturer assessed competency and one of them is social competence, This assessment involves assessment of the 12 items are built. Early research involving 34 people respondents a lecturer at an Islamic High school environment (STAI) Ibnu Sina Batam. The validity of the instrument is determined by the validity of the item and the person. Instruments Questionnaire given to 34 people. The number of logit items from the MEAN and SD. In view of the value of the person whose value reliability of 0.78 and 0.89 reliability item can be concluded that the consistency of the answers of the respondents on a nice and quality than on items in the instrument of social competence good lecturer. The instrument is built and developed meet the characteristics of an appropriate instrument with the rasch model as an instrument of performance appraisal of social competence perceptional lecturer

Highlights

  • To check for secure fit and misfit items could be used as the value of each item MNSQ INFIT; average value and standard deviation added compared, logit values greater than the value of the indicated item misfit

  • Person measure =-0.04 logit shows the average value of the respondents in the instrument competence

  • The value of the Person and the item Reliability: 0.67 0.94: exceptional Reliability of person (0.78) and the item reliability (0.89) it can be concluded that the consistency of the answers of the respondents is a nice and quality items in a nice instrument

Read more

Summary

Regular Good

Table 3 indicates that the respondent's assessment against the rated aspect for KS2, 8.8% (not very good), 17.6% (not good), 41.2% (regular), 26.5% (good), 5.9% (very good). Table 4 indicates that the respondent's assessment against the rated aspect for KS3, 8.8% (not very good), 29.4% (not good), 50.0% (regular), 5.9% (good), 5.9% (very good).

Valid Regular
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Regular Valid
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.