Abstract

Nurses are managing huge number of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which made them highly vulnerable to HIV infection through occupational exposure such as needle stick injuries and splashing of blood/bodily fluids on mucosal surface. This made the practice of post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV crucial among nurses. Therefore, our study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of PEP for HIV among nurses in Bhutan. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 221 registered nurses working at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan between April and June 2017. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data and analysed using SPSS version 21. Majority (80.1%) of our participants had poor knowledge regarding PEP for HIV. Although half (51.1%) of our participants had heard about PEP, only 3 (1.4%) attended a formal training on PEP for HIV. However, a significant proportion of nurses (92.3%) had positive attitude towards PEP for HIV. Out of 221 respondents, 95(43%) had been exposed to needle stick injuries and splashing of blood/bodily fluids while managing patients. Despite significant number of exposures, only 2 (2.1%) of them took PEP and completed 28 days of prophylaxis. Lack of protective barriers at work place (56.8%) and poor knowledge on personal protective equipment (14.7%) were major perceived causes of exposure among study participants. No PEP service (30.2%) and lack of support to report incidents (22.6%) were two major reasons leading to failure of PEP practice among exposed individuals. Despite positive attitude exhibited by majority of our respondents, the level of knowledge and practice of PEP for HIV among nurses was very low. Therefore, a formal training on PEP and 24 hours accessible PEP service with proper guidelines are recommended to improve the overall knowledge and practice of PEP against HIV among nurses.

Highlights

  • Hundreds of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a result of occupational exposure to needle stick injuries each year [1]

  • Knowledge and practice of post exposure prophylaxis for HIV among nurses working at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital (JDWNRH) was very low

  • Despite significant number of exposure to HIV risky conditions such as needle prick injuries and splashing of blood/bodily fluids on mucosal surfaces occurred among study participants, very few of them took Post exposure prophylaxis (PEP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hundreds of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a result of occupational exposure to needle stick injuries each year [1]. Post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) involves administering a short course of antiretroviral therapy (ART) following events with high risk of exposure to HIV [5]. Administering antiretroviral agent as a prophylaxis reduces the risk of acquiring HIV infection by 81% after percutaneous exposure [6]. The overall PEP against HIV infection includes first aid after exposure, counselling, risk assessment, laboratory investigations along with consent from source and exposed individuals followed by 28 days of ART and monitoring [7]. The risk of acquiring HIV by HCPs through occupational exposure remained high among Bhutanese HCPs reflecting the notable increase in HIV cases in Bhutan recently. The increased risk of HIV infection through occupational exposures was reported from developing countries [9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.