Abstract

ObjectiveIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor removal surgery helps surgeons detect early warning signs of postoperative nerve damage, in order to reduce or prevent permanent neuron injury. We performed a study to evaluate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring techniques in intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection surgery. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 29 patients undergoing surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring from 2017 to 2021 at the University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City. Clinical assessment before and after surgery, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to find out the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring techniques were performed. ResultsOf the 29 patients, 4 patients had worse postoperative neurological symptoms (13.8%) at 1 day after surgery. The rate of postoperative worsening neurological symptoms decreased to 10.3% at the 1-month follow-up. SSEP (somatosensory evoked potential) had 75% sensitivity and 72% specificity in detecting postoperative nerve damage, while the sensitivity and specificity of MEP (motor evoked potential) were 100% and 80%, respectively. ConclusionBoth SSEP and MEP have a high sensitivity in detecting postoperative nerve damage, meanwhile, MEP is more sensitive than SSEP. These techniques help predict and possibly prevent timely neurological damage during intramedullary spinal cord resection surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call