Abstract
BackgroundThe F-Scan (F-Scan System by Tekscan, Boston, USA) is an in-shoe pressure measurement device used to provide dynamic pressure, force and timing information to guide appropriate offloading of plantar foot ulcers. Despite the clinical utility of an in-shoe pressure measuring device there are some limitations in the validity and reliability of the output of the F-Scan. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based guideline following information provided by experienced clinicians, synthesis of research evidence and manufacturer’s guidelines on the most appropriate use and interpretation of the data generated by the F-Scan to manage plantar foot ulceration. MethodsUsing the Delphi method a series of sixteen consensus statements were developed following a two-step questionnaire utilising clinicians feedback, a review of evidence and the manufacturer’s guidelines. FindingsSeventeen clinicians responded to the first questionnaire and 11 to the second, that included 8 podiatrists and 9 pedorthists working in the public and private sectors. Of the sixteen statements there was strong consensus for ten and moderate consensus for a further four. Only two statements failed to reach consensus and the feedback from the respondents was of great value providing sound clinical rationale for their rejection. InterpretationThe objective of this study has been achieved in developing a clear and concise set of guiding statements (Table 1) to standardise use of the F-Scan. The application of the guiding statements will encourage standardisation of practice with the aim of highlighting the limitations of the system and reducing potential systematic error in measurement from output produced.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.