Abstract

Two computational techniques commonly employed in the calculation of rocket and thruster expansion plumes are assessed. These are the method of characteristics (MOC), which is derived from the continuum Euler equations, and the direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method, which adopts a discrete particle approach. These techniques vary both in the computational expense and in the accuracy and detail of the solutions that they provide, depending upon the regime of application. The assessment is made with reference to the plume expanding from a small monopropellant hydrazine thruster and concentrates on the isentropic core of the jet for the flow regime lying between the continuum and free molecular limits. It is found that the more numerically intensive DSMC method offers the better correspondence to the available experimental data. In addition, large differences in typical impingement effects such as drag force and heat transfer are found at the free molecular limit of the plume expansion for the two predictive techniques. It is concluded that accurate estimation of impingement potential may only be achieved through application of the discrete particle method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.