Abstract

To investigate observer ability to diagnose exvivo simulated endodontic furcal perforations in root-filled teeth from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images using different artifact reduction algorithms. Our study consisted of 135 first maxillary molar teeth. In 89 teeth, furcation perforations were created using dental burs. Forty-six teeth without artificial perforations were used as controls. MTA Fillapex, Activ GP, and AH Plus were used with or without metal posts. All teeth were imaged using Planmeca ProMax 3-D Max CBCT, and four image modes were obtained as without artifact reduction and with artifact reduction in low, medium, and high modes. Images were evaluated by three observers for the presence or absence of furcation perforation using a five-point scale. Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess observer agreement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated for each image mode, observer, treatment group, and reading and were compared using Χ(2) tests, with a significance level of α=0.05. The effects on diagnosis were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Intraobserver agreements for all observers ranged from 0.857 to 0.945. Kappa coefficients among different observers ranged from 0.673 to 0.763. AUC values ranged from 0.83 to 0.92, and there were no statistically significant differences (P>.05) between different CBCT image modes. Ratings in Activ GP treatment groups with or without posts showed statistically significant differences (P<.001). All CBCT image modes performed similarly in detecting furcal perforations near different root canal sealers with or without posts.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.