Abstract
Radiology reports are an essential communication method for ensuring smooth workflow in healthcare. However, many of these reports are described in free text, and findings documented by radiologists may not be adequately addressed. In this study, focusing on pulmonary nodules, we evaluated whether cases in which radiologists described follow-up as recommended were receiving appropriate treatment. Reports recommending follow-up for pulmonary nodules were automatically extracted using natural language processing. In our evaluation, out of 10,507 reports, 1,501 cases (14.3%) were classified as "reports recommending follow-up for pulmonary nodules." Among these, 958 cases underwent additional imaging tests within 400 days. From the remaining 543 cases, we randomly sampled 42 cases and conducted chart reviews by clinicians to confirm patient care status. Our assessment found that follow-up was not documented in 17 of the 42 cases (40.5%), indicating a high likelihood that appropriate care was not provided.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
